WOMEN’S GOLF · HONG KONG

Ginnie Ding

College: Vanderbilt
Turned pro: 2024
Plays: Right-handed
Events observed: 3
Wins observed: 0
Major wins: 0

Latest: 2026 ISPS Handa Women's Scottish Open · CUT

Biography: PropSports athlete record. Identity: PropSports athlete record.

PLAYER DNA

Ginnie Ding

Women’s golf · All observed (2000–present) · As of Nov 12, 2026

Compared with Women’s majors + LPGA events with full-field leaderboards · 230–468 qualifying players per dimension · 3 editions

7 limited-confidence dimensions · 4 withheld · no composite score

Percentile within the player’s own division cohort (centre 0, outer ring 100). Each axis stands alone: no composite score. A dashed axis with “—” has no published percentile, and the profile line is broken there rather than drawn through it.

Best DNA edgeConsistency40th percentilen=8 rounds · Limited confidence

Most reliableConsistency40th percentilen=8 rounds · Limited confidenceLargest sample at the highest confidence, not the highest score.

Recent form22nd percentileDirection not published (needs six observed starts)Strokes per round vs field · last 2 of 2 observed full-field events

Contention profile

Top 5 (contention): 33rd n=3 starts
Top 10: 27th n=3 starts
Wins observed: 0

DNA DIMENSIONS

Every dimension, with its sample

Par-3 scoring—

Percentile withheld · Full-field comparable hole data is not available for this dimension.

Why this score

Percentile: Not published
Observed value: —
Sample: 0 qualifying holes
Confidence: —
Cohort: Compared with the women’s division cohort
Definition: Performance relative to the field on par-3 holes.

Par-4 scoring—

Percentile withheld · Full-field comparable hole data is not available for this dimension.

Why this score

Percentile: Not published
Observed value: —
Sample: 0 qualifying holes
Confidence: —
Cohort: Compared with the women’s division cohort
Definition: Performance relative to the field on par-4 holes.

Par-5 scoring—

Percentile withheld · Full-field comparable hole data is not available for this dimension.

Why this score

Percentile: Not published
Observed value: —
Sample: 0 qualifying holes
Confidence: —
Cohort: Compared with the women’s division cohort
Definition: Performance relative to the field on par-5 holes.

Scoring vs field16

All Access valuen=8 rounds · limited

Why this score

Percentile: 16th
Observed value: All Access value
Sample: 8 qualifying rounds
Confidence: Limited
Cohort: Compared with the women’s division cohort (441 qualifying players)
Definition: Overall scoring relative to the event field.

Consistency40

All Access valuen=8 rounds · limited

Why this score

Percentile: 40th
Observed value: All Access value
Sample: 8 qualifying rounds
Confidence: Limited
Cohort: Compared with the women’s division cohort (441 qualifying players)
Definition: Lower volatility across rounds and events.

Under-par rounds12

All Access valuen=8 rounds · limited

Why this score

Percentile: 12th
Observed value: All Access value
Sample: 8 qualifying rounds
Confidence: Limited
Cohort: Compared with the women’s division cohort (441 qualifying players)
Definition: Share of rounds finished under par.

Cuts made31

All Access valuen=3 starts · limited

Why this score

Percentile: 31st
Observed value: All Access value
Sample: 3 qualifying starts
Confidence: Limited
Cohort: Compared with the women’s division cohort (468 qualifying players)
Definition: Share of full-field starts that made the cut.

Top-10 rate27

All Access valuen=3 starts · limited

Why this score

Percentile: 27th
Observed value: All Access value
Sample: 3 qualifying starts
Confidence: Limited
Cohort: Compared with the women’s division cohort (468 qualifying players)
Definition: Share of starts finishing inside the top 10.

Contention (top 5)33

All Access valuen=3 starts · limited

Why this score

Percentile: 33rd
Observed value: All Access value
Sample: 3 qualifying starts
Confidence: Limited
Cohort: Compared with the women’s division cohort (468 qualifying players)
Definition: Frequency of finishing inside the top 5.

Recent form22

All Access valuen=8 rounds · limited

Why this score

Percentile: 22nd
Observed value: All Access value
Sample: 8 qualifying rounds
Confidence: Limited
Cohort: Compared with the women’s division cohort (441 qualifying players)
Definition: Performance trend across recent starts.

Major performance—

All Access valuePercentile withheld · Qualifies at 8 full-field rounds (Limited confidence); 0 observed.

Why this score

Percentile: Not published
Observed value: All Access value
Sample: 0 qualifying rounds
Confidence: Insufficient
Cohort: Compared with the women’s division cohort (230 qualifying players)
Definition: Historical performance in major championships.

Raw values behind each percentile

Strokes vs field, rates and both time windows for every dimension.

Included with PropBetEdge All Access.

All Access details

RECENT FORM

How the last starts went

Above the line = better than that event’s field average per round. Larger dots are majors.

Data table

Event	Final round	Vs field	Finish
2026 ISPS Handa Women's Scottish Open	2026-07-26	-3.56	CUT
2025 ISPS Handa Women's Scottish Open	2025-07-27	-1.72	CUT

Last 5 eventsCUT · CUT · T63Cuts made streak0Best recent finishT63 · FREED GROUP Women's Scottish Open

FINISH DISTRIBUTION

Floor and ceiling

26th or worse 33% (1)
Missed cut 67% (2)

3 full-field starts in our record · limited sample.

ROUND PROFILE

Round by round vs field

R1-0.76All observed · n=3

R2-1.99All observed · n=3

R3+0.15All observed · n=1

R4-4.99All observed · n=1

Average strokes per round better (+) or worse (−) than that round’s field average, full-field events only. Consistency: 40th percentile.

BAG DNA

How the game grades, club by club

Fewer than 20 rounds in any PropSports season statistics in coverage.

HISTORY

Career timeline

College / amateurVanderbilt
Turned pro2024
2026 season1 events · 0 wins · 0 top 10s0/1 cuts
2025 season1 events · 0 wins · 0 top 10s0/1 cuts
2023 season1 events · 0 wins · 0 top 10s1/1 cuts
First event in our recordFREED GROUP Women's Scottish OpenAug 6, 2023

College and debut from the PropSports athlete record; results observed in our coverage.

SEASON STATISTICS

2026 LPGA Tour statistics

Season statistics as of 2026-10-01; ranks are within the tour’s published population.
Statistic	Value	Tour rank
Scoring average	79	—
Driving distance	—	—
Driving accuracy %	—	—
Greens in regulation %	—	—
Putts per GIR	—	—
Sand saves %	—	—
Birdies per round	—	—
Rounds	2	—
Events	1	—
Cuts made	0	—
Top 10s	0	—
Wins	0	—
Official money	$0	—

MATCHUPS

Compare

vs Choi Hye-jin

vs Minami Katsu

vs Brooke Henderson

vs Pajaree Anannarukarn

vs Amy Yang

vs Chanettee Wannasaen

Build a matchup

SEASONS

Season results

Observed in PropBetEdge coverage. Vs field uses full-field leaderboards only.
Season	Events	Full-field starts	Cuts made	Rounds	Vs field
2026	1	1	0/1	2	-3.56
2025	1	1	0/1	2	-1.72
2023	1	1	1/1	4	-0.62

Lowest observed round: 70 (−2) in round 2 of FREED GROUP Women's Scottish Open. 1 courses played in coverage.

COURSE HISTORY

Where they have played

Course	Appearances	Best	Top 10	Cuts	Rounds	Vs field
Dundonald Links	3	63	0	1/3	8	-1.63

ALL RESULTS

Event history

All observed events
Event	Finish	Rounds	To par	Coverage
2026 ISPS Handa Women's Scottish Open	CUT	77-81	—	Full field · every round
2025 ISPS Handa Women's Scottish Open	CUT	74-75	—	Full field · every round
FREED GROUP Women's Scottish Open	T63	75-70-72-76	+5	Full field · every round

Identity, sources and coverage

Identity: PropSports athlete record.

“Observed” totals cover events in PropBetEdge coverage, not complete careers.

DATA · PropSports. Results, fields and course setups adapted in part from Wikipedia articles (CC BY-SA 4.0; the redistributed results dataset is available under the same licence). Player photographs are credited per image. Sources & methodology