Women’s golf · All observed (2000–present) · As of Nov 12, 2026
Compared with Women’s majors + LPGA events with full-field leaderboards · 230–468 qualifying players per dimension · 2 editions
4 limited-confidence dimensions · 7 withheld · no composite score
Percentile within the player’s own division cohort (centre 0, outer ring 100). Each axis stands alone: no composite score. A dashed axis with “—” has no published percentile, and the profile line is broken there rather than drawn through it.
Best DNA edgeConsistency91st percentilen=8 rounds · Limited confidenceMost reliableConsistency91st percentilen=8 rounds · Limited confidenceLargest sample at the highest confidence, not the highest score.Recent form0th percentileDirection not published (needs six observed starts)Strokes per round vs field · last 0 of 0 observed full-field events
DNA DIMENSIONS
Every dimension, with its sample
Par-3 scoring—
Percentile withheld · Full-field comparable hole data is not available for this dimension.
Why this score
Percentile
Not published
Observed value
—
Sample
0 qualifying holes
Confidence
—
Cohort
Compared with the women’s division cohort
Definition
Performance relative to the field on par-3 holes.
Par-4 scoring—
Percentile withheld · Full-field comparable hole data is not available for this dimension.
Why this score
Percentile
Not published
Observed value
—
Sample
0 qualifying holes
Confidence
—
Cohort
Compared with the women’s division cohort
Definition
Performance relative to the field on par-4 holes.
Par-5 scoring—
Percentile withheld · Full-field comparable hole data is not available for this dimension.
Why this score
Percentile
Not published
Observed value
—
Sample
0 qualifying holes
Confidence
—
Cohort
Compared with the women’s division cohort
Definition
Performance relative to the field on par-5 holes.
Scoring vs field0
All Access valuen=8 rounds · limited
Why this score
Percentile
0th
Observed value
All Access value
Sample
8 qualifying rounds
Confidence
Limited
Cohort
Compared with the women’s division cohort (441 qualifying players)
Definition
Overall scoring relative to the event field.
Consistency91
All Access valuen=8 rounds · limited
Why this score
Percentile
91st
Observed value
All Access value
Sample
8 qualifying rounds
Confidence
Limited
Cohort
Compared with the women’s division cohort (441 qualifying players)
Definition
Lower volatility across rounds and events.
Under-par rounds2
All Access valuen=8 rounds · limited
Why this score
Percentile
2nd
Observed value
All Access value
Sample
8 qualifying rounds
Confidence
Limited
Cohort
Compared with the women’s division cohort (441 qualifying players)
Definition
Share of rounds finished under par.
Cuts made—
All Access valuePercentile withheld · Qualifies at 3 full-field starts (Limited confidence); 2 observed.
Why this score
Percentile
Not published
Observed value
All Access value
Sample
2 qualifying starts
Confidence
Insufficient
Cohort
Compared with the women’s division cohort (468 qualifying players)
Definition
Share of full-field starts that made the cut.
Top-10 rate—
All Access valuePercentile withheld · Qualifies at 3 full-field starts (Limited confidence); 2 observed.
Why this score
Percentile
Not published
Observed value
All Access value
Sample
2 qualifying starts
Confidence
Insufficient
Cohort
Compared with the women’s division cohort (468 qualifying players)
Definition
Share of starts finishing inside the top 10.
Contention (top 5)—
All Access valuePercentile withheld · Qualifies at 3 full-field starts (Limited confidence); 2 observed.
Why this score
Percentile
Not published
Observed value
All Access value
Sample
2 qualifying starts
Confidence
Insufficient
Cohort
Compared with the women’s division cohort (468 qualifying players)
Definition
Frequency of finishing inside the top 5.
Recent form0
All Access valuen=8 rounds · limited
Why this score
Percentile
0th
Observed value
All Access value
Sample
8 qualifying rounds
Confidence
Limited
Cohort
Compared with the women’s division cohort (441 qualifying players)
Definition
Performance trend across recent starts.
Major performance—
All Access valuePercentile withheld · Qualifies at 8 full-field rounds (Limited confidence); 0 observed.
Why this score
Percentile
Not published
Observed value
All Access value
Sample
0 qualifying rounds
Confidence
Insufficient
Cohort
Compared with the women’s division cohort (230 qualifying players)
Definition
Historical performance in major championships.
◆
Raw values behind each percentile
Strokes vs field, rates and both time windows for every dimension.
“Observed” totals cover events in PropBetEdge coverage, not complete careers.
DATA · PropSports. Results, fields and course setups adapted in part from Wikipedia articles (CC BY-SA 4.0; the redistributed results dataset is available under the same licence). Player photographs are credited per image. Sources & methodology
