WOMEN’S GOLF · JAPAN

Lala Anai

Age
39
Born
Nov 11, 1987
Birthplace
Okazaki, Japan
Turned pro
2008
Plays
Right-handed
Events observed
4
Wins observed
0
Major wins
0

Latest: 2025 Toto Japan Classic · T34

Biography: PropSports athlete record. Identity: PropSports athlete record.

PLAYER DNA

Lala Anai

Women’s golf · All observed (2000–present) · As of Nov 12, 2026

Compared with Women’s majors + LPGA events with full-field leaderboards · 230–468 qualifying players per dimension · 4 editions

7 limited-confidence dimensions · 4 withheld · no composite score

Scoring vs field: 61st percentile, n=12 rounds, Limited confidenceConsistency: 70th percentile, n=12 rounds, Limited confidenceUnder-par rounds: 91st percentile, n=12 rounds, Limited confidenceCuts made: 85th percentile, n=4 starts, Limited confidenceTop-10 rate: 27th percentile, n=4 starts, Limited confidenceContention (top 5): 33rd percentile, n=4 starts, Limited confidenceRecent form: 66th percentile, n=12 rounds, Limited confidence255075100Scoring61Consistency70Under par91Cuts85Top 1027Top 533Form66Majors—
Percentile within the player’s own division cohort (centre 0, outer ring 100). Each axis stands alone: no composite score. A dashed axis with “—” has no published percentile, and the profile line is broken there rather than drawn through it.
Best DNA edgeUnder-par rounds91st percentilen=12 rounds · Limited confidence
Most reliableUnder-par rounds91st percentilen=12 rounds · Limited confidenceLargest sample at the highest confidence, not the highest score.
Recent form66th percentileDirection not published (needs six observed starts)Strokes per round vs field · last 1 of 1 observed full-field events
Contention profile
Top 5 (contention)
33rd n=4 starts
Top 10
27th n=4 starts
Wins observed
0

DNA DIMENSIONS

Every dimension, with its sample

Par-3 scoring—
Percentile withheld · Full-field comparable hole data is not available for this dimension.
Why this score
Percentile
Not published
Observed value
—
Sample
0 qualifying holes
Confidence
—
Cohort
Compared with the women’s division cohort
Definition
Performance relative to the field on par-3 holes.
Par-4 scoring—
Percentile withheld · Full-field comparable hole data is not available for this dimension.
Why this score
Percentile
Not published
Observed value
—
Sample
0 qualifying holes
Confidence
—
Cohort
Compared with the women’s division cohort
Definition
Performance relative to the field on par-4 holes.
Par-5 scoring—
Percentile withheld · Full-field comparable hole data is not available for this dimension.
Why this score
Percentile
Not published
Observed value
—
Sample
0 qualifying holes
Confidence
—
Cohort
Compared with the women’s division cohort
Definition
Performance relative to the field on par-5 holes.
Scoring vs field61
All Access valuen=12 rounds · limited
Why this score
Percentile
61st
Observed value
All Access value
Sample
12 qualifying rounds
Confidence
Limited
Cohort
Compared with the women’s division cohort (441 qualifying players)
Definition
Overall scoring relative to the event field.
Consistency70
All Access valuen=12 rounds · limited
Why this score
Percentile
70th
Observed value
All Access value
Sample
12 qualifying rounds
Confidence
Limited
Cohort
Compared with the women’s division cohort (441 qualifying players)
Definition
Lower volatility across rounds and events.
Under-par rounds91
All Access valuen=12 rounds · limited
Why this score
Percentile
91st
Observed value
All Access value
Sample
12 qualifying rounds
Confidence
Limited
Cohort
Compared with the women’s division cohort (441 qualifying players)
Definition
Share of rounds finished under par.
Cuts made85
All Access valuen=4 starts · limited
Why this score
Percentile
85th
Observed value
All Access value
Sample
4 qualifying starts
Confidence
Limited
Cohort
Compared with the women’s division cohort (468 qualifying players)
Definition
Share of full-field starts that made the cut.
Top-10 rate27
All Access valuen=4 starts · limited
Why this score
Percentile
27th
Observed value
All Access value
Sample
4 qualifying starts
Confidence
Limited
Cohort
Compared with the women’s division cohort (468 qualifying players)
Definition
Share of starts finishing inside the top 10.
Contention (top 5)33
All Access valuen=4 starts · limited
Why this score
Percentile
33rd
Observed value
All Access value
Sample
4 qualifying starts
Confidence
Limited
Cohort
Compared with the women’s division cohort (468 qualifying players)
Definition
Frequency of finishing inside the top 5.
Recent form66
All Access valuen=12 rounds · limited
Why this score
Percentile
66th
Observed value
All Access value
Sample
12 qualifying rounds
Confidence
Limited
Cohort
Compared with the women’s division cohort (441 qualifying players)
Definition
Performance trend across recent starts.
Major performance—
All Access valuePercentile withheld · Qualifies at 8 full-field rounds (Limited confidence); 2 observed.
Why this score
Percentile
Not published
Observed value
All Access value
Sample
2 qualifying rounds
Confidence
Insufficient
Cohort
Compared with the women’s division cohort (230 qualifying players)
Definition
Historical performance in major championships.

Raw values behind each percentile

Strokes vs field, rates and both time windows for every dimension.

Included with PropBetEdge All Access.

All Access details

FINISH DISTRIBUTION

Floor and ceiling

  • 26th or worse 75% (3)
  • Missed cut 25% (1)

4 full-field starts in our record · limited sample.

ROUND PROFILE

Round by round vs field

R1-0.18All observed · n=4
R2+1.23All observed · n=4
R3-1.55All observed · n=3
R4-1.36All observed · n=1

Average strokes per round better (+) or worse (−) than that round’s field average, full-field events only. Consistency: 70th percentile.

BAG DNA

How the game grades, club by club

Fewer than 20 rounds in any PropSports season statistics in coverage.

HISTORY

Career timeline

  1. Turned pro2008
  2. Majors1 appearances · 0 wins
  3. 2025 season1 events · 0 wins · 0 top 10s1/1 cuts
  4. 2024 season1 events · 0 wins · 0 top 10s1/1 cuts
  5. 2023 season2 events · 0 wins · 0 top 10s1/2 cuts
  6. First event in our record2023 Women's British OpenAug 13, 2023

College and debut from the PropSports athlete record; results observed in our coverage.

SEASON STATISTICS

2025 LPGA Tour statistics

Season statistics as of 2026-10-01; ranks are within the tour’s published population.
StatisticValueTour rank
Scoring average70.666664—
Driving distance——
Driving accuracy %——
Greens in regulation %——
Putts per GIR——
Sand saves %——
Birdies per round——
Rounds3—
Events1—
Cuts made1—
Top 10s0—
Wins0—
Official money$12,159—

MATCHUPS

Compare

Build a matchup

SEASONS

Season results

Observed in PropBetEdge coverage. Vs field uses full-field leaderboards only.
SeasonEventsFull-field startsWinsTop 10Cuts madeRoundsVs field
202511001/13+0.27
202411001/13-0.29
202322001/26-0.29

Lowest observed round: 66 (−6) in round 2 of 2024 Toto Japan Classic. 3 courses played in coverage.

MAJORS

Major profile

Appearances and wins across recorded editions; finishes from leaderboards 2000–present; field-relative scoring from full-field editions.

MAJOR RESULTS

Every major in coverage

Major championships
EventFinishRoundsTo parCoverage
2023 Women's British OpenCUT70-77—Full field · every round

COURSE HISTORY

Where they have played

CourseAppearancesBestTop 10CutsRoundsVs field
Seta Golf Course23402/26-0.01
Taiheiyo Club Minori Course14701/14-0.41
Walton Heath Golf Club1—00/12-0.06

ALL RESULTS

Event history

All observed events
EventFinishRoundsTo parCoverage
2025 Toto Japan ClassicT3472-67-73−4Full field · every round
2024 Toto Japan ClassicT3972-66-74−4Full field · every round
TOTO Japan ClassicT4770-68-69-71−10Full field · every round
2023 Women's British OpenCUT70-77—Full field · every round
Identity, sources and coverage

Identity: PropSports athlete record.

“Observed” totals cover events in PropBetEdge coverage, not complete careers.

DATA · PropSports. Results, fields and course setups adapted in part from Wikipedia articles (CC BY-SA 4.0; the redistributed results dataset is available under the same licence). Player photographs are credited per image. Sources & methodology