Women’s golf · All observed (2000–present) · As of Nov 12, 2026
Compared with Women’s majors + LPGA events with full-field leaderboards · 230–468 qualifying players per dimension · 3 editions
7 limited-confidence dimensions · 4 withheld · no composite score
Percentile within the player’s own division cohort (centre 0, outer ring 100). Each axis stands alone: no composite score. A dashed axis with “—” has no published percentile, and the profile line is broken there rather than drawn through it.
Best DNA edgeUnder-par rounds100th percentilen=11 rounds · Limited confidenceMost reliableUnder-par rounds100th percentilen=11 rounds · Limited confidenceLargest sample at the highest confidence, not the highest score.Recent form80th percentileDirection not published (needs six observed starts)Strokes per round vs field · last 1 of 1 observed full-field eventsContention profile
Top 5 (contention)
33rd n=3 starts
Top 10
27th n=3 starts
Wins observed
0
DNA DIMENSIONS
Every dimension, with its sample
Par-3 scoring—
Percentile withheld · Full-field comparable hole data is not available for this dimension.
Why this score
Percentile
Not published
Observed value
—
Sample
0 qualifying holes
Confidence
—
Cohort
Compared with the women’s division cohort
Definition
Performance relative to the field on par-3 holes.
Par-4 scoring—
Percentile withheld · Full-field comparable hole data is not available for this dimension.
Why this score
Percentile
Not published
Observed value
—
Sample
0 qualifying holes
Confidence
—
Cohort
Compared with the women’s division cohort
Definition
Performance relative to the field on par-4 holes.
Par-5 scoring—
Percentile withheld · Full-field comparable hole data is not available for this dimension.
Why this score
Percentile
Not published
Observed value
—
Sample
0 qualifying holes
Confidence
—
Cohort
Compared with the women’s division cohort
Definition
Performance relative to the field on par-5 holes.
Scoring vs field80
All Access valuen=11 rounds · limited
Why this score
Percentile
80th
Observed value
All Access value
Sample
11 qualifying rounds
Confidence
Limited
Cohort
Compared with the women’s division cohort (441 qualifying players)
Definition
Overall scoring relative to the event field.
Consistency64
All Access valuen=11 rounds · limited
Why this score
Percentile
64th
Observed value
All Access value
Sample
11 qualifying rounds
Confidence
Limited
Cohort
Compared with the women’s division cohort (441 qualifying players)
Definition
Lower volatility across rounds and events.
Under-par rounds100
All Access valuen=11 rounds · limited
Why this score
Percentile
100th
Observed value
All Access value
Sample
11 qualifying rounds
Confidence
Limited
Cohort
Compared with the women’s division cohort (441 qualifying players)
Definition
Share of rounds finished under par.
Cuts made98
All Access valuen=3 starts · limited
Why this score
Percentile
98th
Observed value
All Access value
Sample
3 qualifying starts
Confidence
Limited
Cohort
Compared with the women’s division cohort (468 qualifying players)
Definition
Share of full-field starts that made the cut.
Top-10 rate27
All Access valuen=3 starts · limited
Why this score
Percentile
27th
Observed value
All Access value
Sample
3 qualifying starts
Confidence
Limited
Cohort
Compared with the women’s division cohort (468 qualifying players)
Definition
Share of starts finishing inside the top 10.
Contention (top 5)33
All Access valuen=3 starts · limited
Why this score
Percentile
33rd
Observed value
All Access value
Sample
3 qualifying starts
Confidence
Limited
Cohort
Compared with the women’s division cohort (468 qualifying players)
Definition
Frequency of finishing inside the top 5.
Recent form80
All Access valuen=11 rounds · limited
Why this score
Percentile
80th
Observed value
All Access value
Sample
11 qualifying rounds
Confidence
Limited
Cohort
Compared with the women’s division cohort (441 qualifying players)
Definition
Performance trend across recent starts.
Major performance—
All Access valuePercentile withheld · Qualifies at 8 full-field rounds (Limited confidence); 0 observed.
Why this score
Percentile
Not published
Observed value
All Access value
Sample
0 qualifying rounds
Confidence
Insufficient
Cohort
Compared with the women’s division cohort (230 qualifying players)
Definition
Historical performance in major championships.
◆
Raw values behind each percentile
Strokes vs field, rates and both time windows for every dimension.
“Observed” totals cover events in PropBetEdge coverage, not complete careers.
DATA · PropSports. Results, fields and course setups adapted in part from Wikipedia articles (CC BY-SA 4.0; the redistributed results dataset is available under the same licence). Player photographs are credited per image. Sources & methodology
