PROPBETEDGE/GOLF INTELLIGENCE
PGA TOUR · LPGA · MAJORS◆ Command Center
THIS WEEK PGA TOUR · Nov 12 · Austin Championship

WOMEN’S GOLF · CHINA

Zixin Ni

Plays
Right-handed
Events observed
3
Wins observed
0
Major wins
0

Latest: 2025 Blue Bay LPGA · CUT

Biography: PropSports athlete record. Identity: PropSports athlete record.

View matchups

PLAYER DNA

Zixin Ni

Women’s golf · All observed (2000–present) · As of Nov 12, 2026

Compared with Women’s majors + LPGA events with full-field leaderboards · 230–468 qualifying players per dimension · 3 editions

7 limited-confidence dimensions · 4 withheld · no composite score

Scoring vs field: 0th percentile, n=8 rounds, Limited confidenceConsistency: 0th percentile, n=8 rounds, Limited confidenceUnder-par rounds: 12th percentile, n=8 rounds, Limited confidenceCuts made: 31st percentile, n=3 starts, Limited confidenceTop-10 rate: 27th percentile, n=3 starts, Limited confidenceContention (top 5): 33rd percentile, n=3 starts, Limited confidenceRecent form: 0th percentile, n=8 rounds, Limited confidence255075100Scoring0Consistency0Under par12Cuts31Top 1027Top 533Form0Majors—
Percentile within the player’s own division cohort (centre 0, outer ring 100). Each axis stands alone: no composite score. A dashed axis with “—” has no published percentile, and the profile line is broken there rather than drawn through it.
Best DNA edgeContention (top 5)33rd percentilen=3 starts · Limited confidence
Most reliableUnder-par rounds12th percentilen=8 rounds · Limited confidenceLargest sample at the highest confidence, not the highest score.
Recent form0th percentileDirection not published (needs six observed starts)Strokes per round vs field · last 1 of 1 observed full-field events
Contention profile
Top 5 (contention)
33rd n=3 starts
Top 10
27th n=3 starts
Wins observed
0

DNA DIMENSIONS

Every dimension, with its sample

Par-3 scoring—
Percentile withheld · Full-field comparable hole data is not available for this dimension.
Why this score
Percentile
Not published
Observed value
—
Sample
0 qualifying holes
Confidence
—
Cohort
Compared with the women’s division cohort
Definition
Performance relative to the field on par-3 holes.
Par-4 scoring—
Percentile withheld · Full-field comparable hole data is not available for this dimension.
Why this score
Percentile
Not published
Observed value
—
Sample
0 qualifying holes
Confidence
—
Cohort
Compared with the women’s division cohort
Definition
Performance relative to the field on par-4 holes.
Par-5 scoring—
Percentile withheld · Full-field comparable hole data is not available for this dimension.
Why this score
Percentile
Not published
Observed value
—
Sample
0 qualifying holes
Confidence
—
Cohort
Compared with the women’s division cohort
Definition
Performance relative to the field on par-5 holes.
Scoring vs field0
All Access valuen=8 rounds · limited
Why this score
Percentile
0th
Observed value
All Access value
Sample
8 qualifying rounds
Confidence
Limited
Cohort
Compared with the women’s division cohort (441 qualifying players)
Definition
Overall scoring relative to the event field.
Consistency0
All Access valuen=8 rounds · limited
Why this score
Percentile
0th
Observed value
All Access value
Sample
8 qualifying rounds
Confidence
Limited
Cohort
Compared with the women’s division cohort (441 qualifying players)
Definition
Lower volatility across rounds and events.
Under-par rounds12
All Access valuen=8 rounds · limited
Why this score
Percentile
12th
Observed value
All Access value
Sample
8 qualifying rounds
Confidence
Limited
Cohort
Compared with the women’s division cohort (441 qualifying players)
Definition
Share of rounds finished under par.
Cuts made31
All Access valuen=3 starts · limited
Why this score
Percentile
31st
Observed value
All Access value
Sample
3 qualifying starts
Confidence
Limited
Cohort
Compared with the women’s division cohort (468 qualifying players)
Definition
Share of full-field starts that made the cut.
Top-10 rate27
All Access valuen=3 starts · limited
Why this score
Percentile
27th
Observed value
All Access value
Sample
3 qualifying starts
Confidence
Limited
Cohort
Compared with the women’s division cohort (468 qualifying players)
Definition
Share of starts finishing inside the top 10.
Contention (top 5)33
All Access valuen=3 starts · limited
Why this score
Percentile
33rd
Observed value
All Access value
Sample
3 qualifying starts
Confidence
Limited
Cohort
Compared with the women’s division cohort (468 qualifying players)
Definition
Frequency of finishing inside the top 5.
Recent form0
All Access valuen=8 rounds · limited
Why this score
Percentile
0th
Observed value
All Access value
Sample
8 qualifying rounds
Confidence
Limited
Cohort
Compared with the women’s division cohort (441 qualifying players)
Definition
Performance trend across recent starts.
Major performance—
All Access valuePercentile withheld · Qualifies at 8 full-field rounds (Limited confidence); 0 observed.
Why this score
Percentile
Not published
Observed value
All Access value
Sample
0 qualifying rounds
Confidence
Insufficient
Cohort
Compared with the women’s division cohort (230 qualifying players)
Definition
Historical performance in major championships.

Raw values behind each percentile

Strokes vs field, rates and both time windows for every dimension.

Included with PropBetEdge All Access.

All Access details

FINISH DISTRIBUTION

Floor and ceiling

  • 26th or worse 33% (1)
  • Missed cut 67% (2)

3 full-field starts in our record · limited sample.

ROUND PROFILE

Round by round vs field

R1-8.14All observed · n=3
R2-3.77All observed · n=3
R3-2.09All observed · n=1
R4-1.2All observed · n=1

Average strokes per round better (+) or worse (−) than that round’s field average, full-field events only. Consistency: 0th percentile.

BAG DNA

How the game grades, club by club

Fewer than 20 rounds in any PropSports season statistics in coverage.

HISTORY

Career timeline

  1. 2025 season1 events · 0 wins · 0 top 10s0/1 cuts
  2. 2024 season1 events · 0 wins · 0 top 10s0/1 cuts
  3. 2023 season1 events · 0 wins · 0 top 10s1/1 cuts
  4. First event in our recordBuick LPGA ShanghaiOct 15, 2023

College and debut from the PropSports athlete record; results observed in our coverage.

SEASON STATISTICS

2025 LPGA Tour statistics

Season statistics as of 2026-10-01; ranks are within the tour’s published population.
StatisticValueTour rank
Scoring average84.5—
Driving distance——
Driving accuracy %——
Greens in regulation %——
Putts per GIR——
Sand saves %——
Birdies per round——
Rounds2—
Events1—
Cuts made0—
Top 10s0—
Wins0—
Official money$0—

MATCHUPS

Compare

Choi Hye-jin
vs Choi Hye-jin
Minami Katsu
vs Minami Katsu
Brooke Henderson
vs Brooke Henderson
Pajaree Anannarukarn
vs Pajaree Anannarukarn
Amy Yang
vs Amy Yang
Chanettee Wannasaen
vs Chanettee Wannasaen
Build a matchup

SEASONS

Season results

Observed in PropBetEdge coverage. Vs field uses full-field leaderboards only.
SeasonEventsFull-field startsWinsTop 10Cuts madeRoundsVs field
202511000/12-11.02
202411000/12-5.22
202311001/14-1.64

Lowest observed round: 70 (−2) in round 2 of Buick LPGA Shanghai. 2 courses played in coverage.

COURSE HISTORY

Where they have played

CourseAppearancesBestTop 10CutsRoundsVs field
Jian Lake Blue Bay Golf Course2—00/24-8.12
Qizhong Garden Golf Club16401/14-1.64

ALL RESULTS

Event history

All observed events
EventFinishRoundsTo parCoverage
2025 Blue Bay LPGACUT89-80—Full field · every round
2024 Blue Bay LPGACUT77-79—Full field · every round
Buick LPGA ShanghaiT6476-70-73-72+3Full field · every round
Identity, sources and coverage

Identity: PropSports athlete record.

“Observed” totals cover events in PropBetEdge coverage, not complete careers.

DATA · PropSports. Results, fields and course setups adapted in part from Wikipedia articles (CC BY-SA 4.0; the redistributed results dataset is available under the same licence). Player photographs are credited per image. Sources & methodology