WOMEN’S GOLF · AUSTRALIA

June Song

Age
24
Born
Jun 1, 2002
Birthplace
Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
College
SMU
Plays
Right-handed
Events observed
1
Wins observed
0
Major wins
0

Latest: The Ascendant LPGA · CUT

Biography: PropSports athlete record. Identity: PropSports athlete record.

PLAYER DNA

June Song

Player DNA does not yet have enough comparable sample. Dimensions publish once full-field rounds in our record clear each dimension’s qualification rule.

DNA DIMENSIONS

Every dimension, with its sample

Par-3 scoring—
Percentile withheld · Full-field comparable hole data is not available for this dimension.
Why this score
Percentile
Not published
Observed value
—
Sample
0 qualifying holes
Confidence
—
Cohort
Compared with the women’s division cohort
Definition
Performance relative to the field on par-3 holes.
Par-4 scoring—
Percentile withheld · Full-field comparable hole data is not available for this dimension.
Why this score
Percentile
Not published
Observed value
—
Sample
0 qualifying holes
Confidence
—
Cohort
Compared with the women’s division cohort
Definition
Performance relative to the field on par-4 holes.
Par-5 scoring—
Percentile withheld · Full-field comparable hole data is not available for this dimension.
Why this score
Percentile
Not published
Observed value
—
Sample
0 qualifying holes
Confidence
—
Cohort
Compared with the women’s division cohort
Definition
Performance relative to the field on par-5 holes.
Scoring vs field—
All Access valuePercentile withheld · Qualifies at 8 full-field rounds (Limited confidence); 2 observed.
Why this score
Percentile
Not published
Observed value
All Access value
Sample
2 qualifying rounds
Confidence
Insufficient
Cohort
Compared with the women’s division cohort (441 qualifying players)
Definition
Overall scoring relative to the event field.
Consistency—
All Access valuePercentile withheld · Qualifies at 8 full-field rounds (Limited confidence); 2 observed.
Why this score
Percentile
Not published
Observed value
All Access value
Sample
2 qualifying rounds
Confidence
Insufficient
Cohort
Compared with the women’s division cohort (441 qualifying players)
Definition
Lower volatility across rounds and events.
Under-par rounds—
All Access valuePercentile withheld · Qualifies at 8 full-field rounds (Limited confidence); 2 observed.
Why this score
Percentile
Not published
Observed value
All Access value
Sample
2 qualifying rounds
Confidence
Insufficient
Cohort
Compared with the women’s division cohort (441 qualifying players)
Definition
Share of rounds finished under par.
Cuts made—
All Access valuePercentile withheld · Qualifies at 3 full-field starts (Limited confidence); 1 observed.
Why this score
Percentile
Not published
Observed value
All Access value
Sample
1 qualifying starts
Confidence
Insufficient
Cohort
Compared with the women’s division cohort (468 qualifying players)
Definition
Share of full-field starts that made the cut.
Top-10 rate—
All Access valuePercentile withheld · Qualifies at 3 full-field starts (Limited confidence); 1 observed.
Why this score
Percentile
Not published
Observed value
All Access value
Sample
1 qualifying starts
Confidence
Insufficient
Cohort
Compared with the women’s division cohort (468 qualifying players)
Definition
Share of starts finishing inside the top 10.
Contention (top 5)—
All Access valuePercentile withheld · Qualifies at 3 full-field starts (Limited confidence); 1 observed.
Why this score
Percentile
Not published
Observed value
All Access value
Sample
1 qualifying starts
Confidence
Insufficient
Cohort
Compared with the women’s division cohort (468 qualifying players)
Definition
Frequency of finishing inside the top 5.
Recent form—
All Access valuePercentile withheld · Qualifies at 8 full-field rounds (Limited confidence); 2 observed.
Why this score
Percentile
Not published
Observed value
All Access value
Sample
2 qualifying rounds
Confidence
Insufficient
Cohort
Compared with the women’s division cohort (441 qualifying players)
Definition
Performance trend across recent starts.
Major performance—
All Access valuePercentile withheld · Qualifies at 8 full-field rounds (Limited confidence); 0 observed.
Why this score
Percentile
Not published
Observed value
All Access value
Sample
0 qualifying rounds
Confidence
Insufficient
Cohort
Compared with the women’s division cohort (230 qualifying players)
Definition
Historical performance in major championships.

Raw values behind each percentile

Strokes vs field, rates and both time windows for every dimension.

Included with PropBetEdge All Access.

All Access details

FINISH DISTRIBUTION

Floor and ceiling

  • Missed cut 100% (1)

1 full-field starts in our record · limited sample.

ROUND PROFILE

Round by round vs field

R1+0.1All observed · n=1
R2-2.18All observed · n=1
R3—All observed · n=0
R4—All observed · n=0

Average strokes per round better (+) or worse (−) than that round’s field average, full-field events only.

HISTORY

Career timeline

  1. College / amateurSMU
  2. 2023 season1 events · 0 wins · 0 top 10s0/1 cuts
  3. First event in our recordThe Ascendant LPGAOct 8, 2023

College and debut from the PropSports athlete record; results observed in our coverage.

MATCHUPS

Compare

Build a matchup

SEASONS

Season results

Observed in PropBetEdge coverage. Vs field uses full-field leaderboards only.
SeasonEventsFull-field startsWinsTop 10Cuts madeRoundsVs field
202311000/12-1.04

Lowest observed round: 72 (+1) in round 1 of The Ascendant LPGA. 1 courses played in coverage.

COURSE HISTORY

Where they have played

CourseAppearancesBestTop 10CutsRoundsVs field
Old American Golf Course1—00/12-1.04

ALL RESULTS

Event history

All observed events
EventFinishRoundsTo parCoverage
The Ascendant LPGACUT72-74—Full field · every round
Identity, sources and coverage

Identity: PropSports athlete record.

“Observed” totals cover events in PropBetEdge coverage, not complete careers.

DATA · PropSports. Results, fields and course setups adapted in part from Wikipedia articles (CC BY-SA 4.0; the redistributed results dataset is available under the same licence). Player photographs are credited per image. Sources & methodology