PLAYER DNA
Katherine Muzi
Player DNA does not yet have enough comparable sample. Dimensions publish once full-field rounds in our record clear each dimension’s qualification rule.
DNA DIMENSIONS
Every dimension, with its sample
Par-3 scoring—
Why this score
- Percentile
- Not published
- Observed value
- All Access value
- Sample
- 8 qualifying holes
- Confidence
- Insufficient
- Cohort
- Compared with the women’s division cohort (45 qualifying players)
- Definition
- Performance relative to the field on par-3 holes.
Par-4 scoring—
Why this score
- Percentile
- Not published
- Observed value
- All Access value
- Sample
- 22 qualifying holes
- Confidence
- Insufficient
- Cohort
- Compared with the women’s division cohort (148 qualifying players)
- Definition
- Performance relative to the field on par-4 holes.
Par-5 scoring—
Why this score
- Percentile
- Not published
- Observed value
- All Access value
- Sample
- 6 qualifying holes
- Confidence
- Insufficient
- Cohort
- Compared with the women’s division cohort (16 qualifying players)
- Definition
- Performance relative to the field on par-5 holes.
Scoring vs field—
Why this score
- Percentile
- Not published
- Observed value
- All Access value
- Sample
- 6 qualifying rounds
- Confidence
- Insufficient
- Cohort
- Compared with the women’s division cohort (441 qualifying players)
- Definition
- Overall scoring relative to the event field.
Consistency—
Why this score
- Percentile
- Not published
- Observed value
- All Access value
- Sample
- 6 qualifying rounds
- Confidence
- Insufficient
- Cohort
- Compared with the women’s division cohort (441 qualifying players)
- Definition
- Lower volatility across rounds and events.
Under-par rounds—
Why this score
- Percentile
- Not published
- Observed value
- All Access value
- Sample
- 6 qualifying rounds
- Confidence
- Insufficient
- Cohort
- Compared with the women’s division cohort (441 qualifying players)
- Definition
- Share of rounds finished under par.
Cuts made—
Why this score
- Percentile
- Not published
- Observed value
- All Access value
- Sample
- 2 qualifying starts
- Confidence
- Insufficient
- Cohort
- Compared with the women’s division cohort (468 qualifying players)
- Definition
- Share of full-field starts that made the cut.
Top-10 rate—
Why this score
- Percentile
- Not published
- Observed value
- All Access value
- Sample
- 2 qualifying starts
- Confidence
- Insufficient
- Cohort
- Compared with the women’s division cohort (468 qualifying players)
- Definition
- Share of starts finishing inside the top 10.
Contention (top 5)—
Why this score
- Percentile
- Not published
- Observed value
- All Access value
- Sample
- 2 qualifying starts
- Confidence
- Insufficient
- Cohort
- Compared with the women’s division cohort (468 qualifying players)
- Definition
- Frequency of finishing inside the top 5.
Major performance—
Why this score
- Percentile
- Not published
- Observed value
- All Access value
- Sample
- 2 qualifying rounds
- Confidence
- Insufficient
- Cohort
- Compared with the women’s division cohort (230 qualifying players)
- Definition
- Historical performance in major championships.
◆Raw values behind each percentile
Strokes vs field, rates and both time windows for every dimension.
Included with PropBetEdge All Access.
All Access details ↗ FINISH DISTRIBUTION
Floor and ceiling
- 6th–10th 50% (1)
- Missed cut 50% (1)
2 full-field starts in our record · limited sample.
ROUND PROFILE
Round by round vs field
R1-5.17All observed · n=2
R2+0.03All observed · n=2
R3+4.52All observed · n=1
R4+3.66All observed · n=1
Average strokes per round better (+) or worse (−) than that round’s field average, full-field events only.
BAG DNA
How the game grades, club by club
Fewer than 20 rounds in any PropSports season statistics in coverage.
HISTORY
Career timeline
- College / amateurSouth Carolina
- Turned pro2023
- Majors1 appearances · 0 wins
- 2026 season1 events · 0 wins · 0 top 10s0/1 cuts
- 2023 season1 events · 0 wins · 1 top 10s1/1 cuts
- First event in our recordThe Ascendant LPGAOct 8, 2023
College and debut from the PropSports athlete record; results observed in our coverage.
SEASON STATISTICS
2026 LPGA Tour statistics
Season statistics as of 2026-10-01; ranks are within the tour’s published population.| Statistic | Value | Tour rank |
|---|
| Scoring average | 53.333332 | — |
| Driving distance | — | — |
| Driving accuracy % | — | — |
| Greens in regulation % | — | — |
| Putts per GIR | — | — |
| Sand saves % | — | — |
| Birdies per round | — | — |
| Rounds | 3 | — |
| Events | 1 | — |
| Cuts made | 0 | — |
| Top 10s | 0 | — |
| Wins | 0 | — |
| Official money | $0 | — |
SEASONS
Season results
Observed in PropBetEdge coverage. Vs field uses full-field leaderboards only.| Season | Events | Full-field starts | Wins | Top 10 | Cuts made | Rounds | Vs field |
|---|
| 2026 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0/1 | 2 | -6.1 |
| 2023 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1/1 | 4 | +2.53 |
Lowest observed round: 68 (−3) in round 4 of The Ascendant LPGA. 2 courses played in coverage.
MAJORS
Major profile
- Appearances
- 1
- Wins
- 0
- Top 5
- 0
- Top 10
- 0
- Best
- —
- Vs field
- -6.1
2026 CUT
Appearances and wins across recorded editions; finishes from leaderboards 2000–present; field-relative scoring from full-field editions.
MAJOR RESULTS
Every major in coverage
COURSE HISTORY
Where they have played
Identity, sources and coverage
Identity: PropSports athlete record.
“Observed” totals cover events in PropBetEdge coverage, not complete careers.
DATA · PropSports. Results, fields and course setups adapted in part from Wikipedia articles (CC BY-SA 4.0; the redistributed results dataset is available under the same licence). Player photographs are credited per image. Sources & methodology