WOMEN’S GOLF · CANADA

Katie Cranston

Age
22
Born
May 19, 2004
Birthplace
Oakville, Ontario, Canada
College
Auburn
Plays
Right-handed
Events observed
4
Wins observed
0
Major wins
0

Latest: 2026 CPKC Women's Open · CUT

Biography: PropSports athlete record. Identity: PropSports athlete record.

PLAYER DNA

Katie Cranston

Women’s golf · All observed (2000–present) · As of Nov 12, 2026

Compared with Women’s majors + LPGA events with full-field leaderboards · 230–468 qualifying players per dimension · 4 editions

7 limited-confidence dimensions · 4 withheld · no composite score

Scoring vs field: 14th percentile, n=10 rounds, Limited confidenceConsistency: 78th percentile, n=10 rounds, Limited confidenceUnder-par rounds: 2nd percentile, n=10 rounds, Limited confidenceCuts made: 21st percentile, n=4 starts, Limited confidenceTop-10 rate: 27th percentile, n=4 starts, Limited confidenceContention (top 5): 33rd percentile, n=4 starts, Limited confidenceRecent form: 17th percentile, n=10 rounds, Limited confidence255075100Scoring14Consistency78Under par2Cuts21Top 1027Top 533Form17Majors—
Percentile within the player’s own division cohort (centre 0, outer ring 100). Each axis stands alone: no composite score. A dashed axis with “—” has no published percentile, and the profile line is broken there rather than drawn through it.
Best DNA edgeConsistency78th percentilen=10 rounds · Limited confidence
Most reliableConsistency78th percentilen=10 rounds · Limited confidenceLargest sample at the highest confidence, not the highest score.
Recent form17th percentileDirection not published (needs six observed starts)Strokes per round vs field · last 2 of 2 observed full-field events
Contention profile
Top 5 (contention)
33rd n=4 starts
Top 10
27th n=4 starts
Wins observed
0

DNA DIMENSIONS

Every dimension, with its sample

Par-3 scoring—
Percentile withheld · Full-field comparable hole data is not available for this dimension.
Why this score
Percentile
Not published
Observed value
—
Sample
0 qualifying holes
Confidence
—
Cohort
Compared with the women’s division cohort
Definition
Performance relative to the field on par-3 holes.
Par-4 scoring—
Percentile withheld · Full-field comparable hole data is not available for this dimension.
Why this score
Percentile
Not published
Observed value
—
Sample
0 qualifying holes
Confidence
—
Cohort
Compared with the women’s division cohort
Definition
Performance relative to the field on par-4 holes.
Par-5 scoring—
Percentile withheld · Full-field comparable hole data is not available for this dimension.
Why this score
Percentile
Not published
Observed value
—
Sample
0 qualifying holes
Confidence
—
Cohort
Compared with the women’s division cohort
Definition
Performance relative to the field on par-5 holes.
Scoring vs field14
All Access valuen=10 rounds · limited
Why this score
Percentile
14th
Observed value
All Access value
Sample
10 qualifying rounds
Confidence
Limited
Cohort
Compared with the women’s division cohort (441 qualifying players)
Definition
Overall scoring relative to the event field.
Consistency78
All Access valuen=10 rounds · limited
Why this score
Percentile
78th
Observed value
All Access value
Sample
10 qualifying rounds
Confidence
Limited
Cohort
Compared with the women’s division cohort (441 qualifying players)
Definition
Lower volatility across rounds and events.
Under-par rounds2
All Access valuen=10 rounds · limited
Why this score
Percentile
2nd
Observed value
All Access value
Sample
10 qualifying rounds
Confidence
Limited
Cohort
Compared with the women’s division cohort (441 qualifying players)
Definition
Share of rounds finished under par.
Cuts made21
All Access valuen=4 starts · limited
Why this score
Percentile
21st
Observed value
All Access value
Sample
4 qualifying starts
Confidence
Limited
Cohort
Compared with the women’s division cohort (468 qualifying players)
Definition
Share of full-field starts that made the cut.
Top-10 rate27
All Access valuen=4 starts · limited
Why this score
Percentile
27th
Observed value
All Access value
Sample
4 qualifying starts
Confidence
Limited
Cohort
Compared with the women’s division cohort (468 qualifying players)
Definition
Share of starts finishing inside the top 10.
Contention (top 5)33
All Access valuen=4 starts · limited
Why this score
Percentile
33rd
Observed value
All Access value
Sample
4 qualifying starts
Confidence
Limited
Cohort
Compared with the women’s division cohort (468 qualifying players)
Definition
Frequency of finishing inside the top 5.
Recent form17
All Access valuen=10 rounds · limited
Why this score
Percentile
17th
Observed value
All Access value
Sample
10 qualifying rounds
Confidence
Limited
Cohort
Compared with the women’s division cohort (441 qualifying players)
Definition
Performance trend across recent starts.
Major performance—
All Access valuePercentile withheld · Qualifies at 8 full-field rounds (Limited confidence); 0 observed.
Why this score
Percentile
Not published
Observed value
All Access value
Sample
0 qualifying rounds
Confidence
Insufficient
Cohort
Compared with the women’s division cohort (230 qualifying players)
Definition
Historical performance in major championships.

Raw values behind each percentile

Strokes vs field, rates and both time windows for every dimension.

Included with PropBetEdge All Access.

All Access details

RECENT FORM

How the last starts went

+10-4202520262025 CPKC Women's Open: -1.32 vs field2026 CPKC Women's Open: -4.04 vs field
Above the line = better than that event’s field average per round. Larger dots are majors.
Data table
EventFinal roundVs fieldFinish
2026 CPKC Women's Open2026-08-23-4.04CUT
2025 CPKC Women's Open2025-08-24-1.32T71
Last 5 eventsCUT · T71 · CUT · CUTCuts made streak0Best recent finishT71 · CPKC Women's Open

FINISH DISTRIBUTION

Floor and ceiling

  • 26th or worse 25% (1)
  • Missed cut 75% (3)

4 full-field starts in our record · limited sample.

ROUND PROFILE

Round by round vs field

R1-1.41All observed · n=4
R2-1.19All observed · n=4
R3-4All observed · n=1
R4-3.21All observed · n=1

Average strokes per round better (+) or worse (−) than that round’s field average, full-field events only. Consistency: 78th percentile.

BAG DNA

How the game grades, club by club

Fewer than 20 rounds in any PropSports season statistics in coverage.

HISTORY

Career timeline

  1. College / amateurAuburn
  2. 2026 season1 events · 0 wins · 0 top 10s0/1 cuts
  3. 2025 season1 events · 0 wins · 0 top 10s1/1 cuts
  4. 2024 season1 events · 0 wins · 0 top 10s0/1 cuts
  5. First event in our recordCPKC Women's OpenAug 27, 2023

College and debut from the PropSports athlete record; results observed in our coverage.

SEASON STATISTICS

2026 LPGA Tour statistics

Season statistics as of 2026-10-01; ranks are within the tour’s published population.
StatisticValueTour rank
Scoring average74.5—
Driving distance——
Driving accuracy %——
Greens in regulation %——
Putts per GIR——
Sand saves %——
Birdies per round——
Rounds2—
Events1—
Cuts made0—
Top 10s0—
Wins0—
Official money$0—

MATCHUPS

Compare

Build a matchup

SEASONS

Season results

Observed in PropBetEdge coverage. Vs field uses full-field leaderboards only.
SeasonEventsFull-field startsWinsTop 10Cuts madeRoundsVs field
202611000/12-4.04
202511001/14-1.32
202411000/12-0.27
202311000/12-1.85

Lowest observed round: 71 (E) in round 1 of 2025 CPKC Women's Open. 4 courses played in coverage.

COURSE HISTORY

Where they have played

CourseAppearancesBestTop 10CutsRoundsVs field
Royal Mayfair Golf & Country Club1—00/12-4.04
Mississaugua Golf & Country Club 17101/14-1.32
Earl Grey Golf Club1—00/12-0.27
Shaughnessy G&CC1—00/12-1.85

ALL RESULTS

Event history

All observed events
EventFinishRoundsTo parCoverage
2026 CPKC Women's OpenCUT74-75—Full field · every round
2025 CPKC Women's OpenT7171-71-75-74+7Full field · every round
2024 CPKC Women's OpenCUT73-77—Full field · every round
CPKC Women's OpenCUT80-73—Full field · every round
Identity, sources and coverage

Identity: PropSports athlete record.

“Observed” totals cover events in PropBetEdge coverage, not complete careers.

DATA · PropSports. Results, fields and course setups adapted in part from Wikipedia articles (CC BY-SA 4.0; the redistributed results dataset is available under the same licence). Player photographs are credited per image. Sources & methodology