PROPBETEDGE/GOLF INTELLIGENCE
PGA TOUR · LPGA · MAJORS◆ Command Center
THIS WEEK PGA TOUR · Nov 12 · Austin Championship

WOMEN’S GOLF · USA

Mia Hammond

Age
18
Born
Feb 18, 2008
Birthplace
New Albany, Ohio, USA
Plays
Right-handed
Events observed
4
Wins observed
0
Major wins
0

Latest: 2026 ShopRite LPGA Classic · CUT

Biography: PropSports athlete record. Identity: PropSports athlete record.

View matchups

PLAYER DNA

Mia Hammond

Women’s golf · All observed (2000–present) · As of Nov 12, 2026

Compared with Women’s majors + LPGA events with full-field leaderboards · 230–468 qualifying players per dimension · 4 editions

7 limited-confidence dimensions · 4 withheld · no composite score

Scoring vs field: 33rd percentile, n=10 rounds, Limited confidenceConsistency: 38th percentile, n=10 rounds, Limited confidenceUnder-par rounds: 56th percentile, n=10 rounds, Limited confidenceCuts made: 21st percentile, n=4 starts, Limited confidenceTop-10 rate: 27th percentile, n=4 starts, Limited confidenceContention (top 5): 33rd percentile, n=4 starts, Limited confidenceRecent form: 39th percentile, n=10 rounds, Limited confidence255075100Scoring33Consistency38Under par56Cuts21Top 1027Top 533Form39Majors—
Percentile within the player’s own division cohort (centre 0, outer ring 100). Each axis stands alone: no composite score. A dashed axis with “—” has no published percentile, and the profile line is broken there rather than drawn through it.
Best DNA edgeUnder-par rounds56th percentilen=10 rounds · Limited confidence
Most reliableUnder-par rounds56th percentilen=10 rounds · Limited confidenceLargest sample at the highest confidence, not the highest score.
Recent form39th percentileDirection not published (needs six observed starts)Strokes per round vs field · last 1 of 1 observed full-field events
Contention profile
Top 5 (contention)
33rd n=4 starts
Top 10
27th n=4 starts
Wins observed
0

DNA DIMENSIONS

Every dimension, with its sample

Par-3 scoring—
Percentile withheld · Full-field comparable hole data is not available for this dimension.
Why this score
Percentile
Not published
Observed value
—
Sample
0 qualifying holes
Confidence
—
Cohort
Compared with the women’s division cohort
Definition
Performance relative to the field on par-3 holes.
Par-4 scoring—
Percentile withheld · Full-field comparable hole data is not available for this dimension.
Why this score
Percentile
Not published
Observed value
—
Sample
0 qualifying holes
Confidence
—
Cohort
Compared with the women’s division cohort
Definition
Performance relative to the field on par-4 holes.
Par-5 scoring—
Percentile withheld · Full-field comparable hole data is not available for this dimension.
Why this score
Percentile
Not published
Observed value
—
Sample
0 qualifying holes
Confidence
—
Cohort
Compared with the women’s division cohort
Definition
Performance relative to the field on par-5 holes.
Scoring vs field33
All Access valuen=10 rounds · limited
Why this score
Percentile
33rd
Observed value
All Access value
Sample
10 qualifying rounds
Confidence
Limited
Cohort
Compared with the women’s division cohort (441 qualifying players)
Definition
Overall scoring relative to the event field.
Consistency38
All Access valuen=10 rounds · limited
Why this score
Percentile
38th
Observed value
All Access value
Sample
10 qualifying rounds
Confidence
Limited
Cohort
Compared with the women’s division cohort (441 qualifying players)
Definition
Lower volatility across rounds and events.
Under-par rounds56
All Access valuen=10 rounds · limited
Why this score
Percentile
56th
Observed value
All Access value
Sample
10 qualifying rounds
Confidence
Limited
Cohort
Compared with the women’s division cohort (441 qualifying players)
Definition
Share of rounds finished under par.
Cuts made21
All Access valuen=4 starts · limited
Why this score
Percentile
21st
Observed value
All Access value
Sample
4 qualifying starts
Confidence
Limited
Cohort
Compared with the women’s division cohort (468 qualifying players)
Definition
Share of full-field starts that made the cut.
Top-10 rate27
All Access valuen=4 starts · limited
Why this score
Percentile
27th
Observed value
All Access value
Sample
4 qualifying starts
Confidence
Limited
Cohort
Compared with the women’s division cohort (468 qualifying players)
Definition
Share of starts finishing inside the top 10.
Contention (top 5)33
All Access valuen=4 starts · limited
Why this score
Percentile
33rd
Observed value
All Access value
Sample
4 qualifying starts
Confidence
Limited
Cohort
Compared with the women’s division cohort (468 qualifying players)
Definition
Frequency of finishing inside the top 5.
Recent form39
All Access valuen=10 rounds · limited
Why this score
Percentile
39th
Observed value
All Access value
Sample
10 qualifying rounds
Confidence
Limited
Cohort
Compared with the women’s division cohort (441 qualifying players)
Definition
Performance trend across recent starts.
Major performance—
All Access valuePercentile withheld · Qualifies at 8 full-field rounds (Limited confidence); 0 observed.
Why this score
Percentile
Not published
Observed value
All Access value
Sample
0 qualifying rounds
Confidence
Insufficient
Cohort
Compared with the women’s division cohort (230 qualifying players)
Definition
Historical performance in major championships.

Raw values behind each percentile

Strokes vs field, rates and both time windows for every dimension.

Included with PropBetEdge All Access.

All Access details

FINISH DISTRIBUTION

Floor and ceiling

  • 26th or worse 25% (1)
  • Missed cut 75% (3)

4 full-field starts in our record · limited sample.

ROUND PROFILE

Round by round vs field

R1-1.6All observed · n=4
R2-0.42All observed · n=4
R3+0.61All observed · n=1
R4-1.38All observed · n=1

Average strokes per round better (+) or worse (−) than that round’s field average, full-field events only. Consistency: 38th percentile.

BAG DNA

How the game grades, club by club

Fewer than 20 rounds in any PropSports season statistics in coverage.

HISTORY

Career timeline

  1. 2026 season1 events · 0 wins · 0 top 10s0/1 cuts
  2. 2024 season1 events · 0 wins · 0 top 10s0/1 cuts
  3. 2023 season2 events · 0 wins · 0 top 10s1/2 cuts
  4. First event in our recordDana OpenJul 16, 2023

College and debut from the PropSports athlete record; results observed in our coverage.

SEASON STATISTICS

2026 LPGA Tour statistics

Season statistics as of 2026-10-01; ranks are within the tour’s published population.
StatisticValueTour rank
Scoring average75—
Driving distance——
Driving accuracy %——
Greens in regulation %——
Putts per GIR——
Sand saves %——
Birdies per round——
Rounds2—
Events1—
Cuts made0—
Top 10s0—
Wins0—
Official money$0—

MATCHUPS

Compare

Choi Hye-jin
vs Choi Hye-jin
Minami Katsu
vs Minami Katsu
Brooke Henderson
vs Brooke Henderson
Pajaree Anannarukarn
vs Pajaree Anannarukarn
Amy Yang
vs Amy Yang
Chanettee Wannasaen
vs Chanettee Wannasaen
Build a matchup

SEASONS

Season results

Observed in PropBetEdge coverage. Vs field uses full-field leaderboards only.
SeasonEventsFull-field startsWinsTop 10Cuts madeRoundsVs field
202611000/12-2.16
202411000/12-1.43
202322001/26-0.28

Lowest observed round: 68 (−3) in round 1 of Dana Open. 3 courses played in coverage.

COURSE HISTORY

Where they have played

CourseAppearancesBestTop 10CutsRoundsVs field
Highland Meadows GC22601/26+0.22
Seaview Hotel and Golf Club1—00/12-2.16
Kenwood CC1—00/12-2.95

ALL RESULTS

Event history

All observed events
EventFinishRoundsTo parCoverage
2026 ShopRite LPGA ClassicCUT75-75—Full field · every round
2024 Dana OpenCUT76-69—Full field · every round
Kroger Queen City Championship pres. by P&GCUT72-77—Full field · every round
Dana OpenT2668-68-70-72−6Full field · every round
Identity, sources and coverage

Identity: PropSports athlete record.

“Observed” totals cover events in PropBetEdge coverage, not complete careers.

DATA · PropSports. Results, fields and course setups adapted in part from Wikipedia articles (CC BY-SA 4.0; the redistributed results dataset is available under the same licence). Player photographs are credited per image. Sources & methodology