WOMEN’S GOLF · USA

Riley Rennell

Age: 28
Born: Jul 21, 1998
Birthplace: Columbia, Tennessee, USA
Turned pro: 2017
Plays: Right-handed
Events observed: 14
Wins observed: 0
Major wins: 0

Latest: 2024 Portland Classic · CUT

Biography: PropSports athlete record. Identity: PropSports athlete record.

PLAYER DNA

Riley Rennell

Women’s golf · All observed (2000–present) · As of Nov 12, 2026

Compared with Women’s majors + LPGA events with full-field leaderboards · 230–468 qualifying players per dimension · 14 editions

3 high · 4 medium-confidence dimensions · 4 withheld · no composite score

Percentile within the player’s own division cohort (centre 0, outer ring 100). Each axis stands alone: no composite score. A dashed axis with “—” has no published percentile, and the profile line is broken there rather than drawn through it.

Best DNA edgeConsistency91st percentilen=34 rounds · Medium confidence

Most reliableContention (top 5)33rd percentilen=14 starts · High confidenceLargest sample at the highest confidence, not the highest score.

Recent form35th percentileDirection not published (needs six observed starts)Strokes per round vs field · last 0 of 0 observed full-field events

Contention profile

Top 5 (contention): 33rd n=14 starts
Top 10: 27th n=14 starts
Wins observed: 0

DNA DIMENSIONS

Every dimension, with its sample

Par-3 scoring—

Percentile withheld · Full-field comparable hole data is not available for this dimension.

Why this score

Percentile: Not published
Observed value: —
Sample: 0 qualifying holes
Confidence: —
Cohort: Compared with the women’s division cohort
Definition: Performance relative to the field on par-3 holes.

Par-4 scoring—

Percentile withheld · Full-field comparable hole data is not available for this dimension.

Why this score

Percentile: Not published
Observed value: —
Sample: 0 qualifying holes
Confidence: —
Cohort: Compared with the women’s division cohort
Definition: Performance relative to the field on par-4 holes.

Par-5 scoring—

Percentile withheld · Full-field comparable hole data is not available for this dimension.

Why this score

Percentile: Not published
Observed value: —
Sample: 0 qualifying holes
Confidence: —
Cohort: Compared with the women’s division cohort
Definition: Performance relative to the field on par-5 holes.

Scoring vs field23

All Access valuen=34 rounds · medium

Why this score

Percentile: 23rd
Observed value: All Access value
Sample: 34 qualifying rounds
Confidence: Medium
Cohort: Compared with the women’s division cohort (441 qualifying players)
Definition: Overall scoring relative to the event field.

Consistency91

All Access valuen=34 rounds · medium

Why this score

Percentile: 91st
Observed value: All Access value
Sample: 34 qualifying rounds
Confidence: Medium
Cohort: Compared with the women’s division cohort (441 qualifying players)
Definition: Lower volatility across rounds and events.

Under-par rounds20

All Access valuen=34 rounds · medium

Why this score

Percentile: 20th
Observed value: All Access value
Sample: 34 qualifying rounds
Confidence: Medium
Cohort: Compared with the women’s division cohort (441 qualifying players)
Definition: Share of rounds finished under par.

Cuts made18

All Access valuen=14 starts · high

Why this score

Percentile: 18th
Observed value: All Access value
Sample: 14 qualifying starts
Confidence: High
Cohort: Compared with the women’s division cohort (468 qualifying players)
Definition: Share of full-field starts that made the cut.

Top-10 rate27

All Access valuen=14 starts · high

Why this score

Percentile: 27th
Observed value: All Access value
Sample: 14 qualifying starts
Confidence: High
Cohort: Compared with the women’s division cohort (468 qualifying players)
Definition: Share of starts finishing inside the top 10.

Contention (top 5)33

All Access valuen=14 starts · high

Why this score

Percentile: 33rd
Observed value: All Access value
Sample: 14 qualifying starts
Confidence: High
Cohort: Compared with the women’s division cohort (468 qualifying players)
Definition: Frequency of finishing inside the top 5.

Recent form35

All Access valuen=24 rounds · medium

Why this score

Percentile: 35th
Observed value: All Access value
Sample: 24 qualifying rounds
Confidence: Medium
Cohort: Compared with the women’s division cohort (441 qualifying players)
Definition: Performance trend across recent starts.

Major performance—

All Access valuePercentile withheld · Qualifies at 8 full-field rounds (Limited confidence); 0 observed.

Why this score

Percentile: Not published
Observed value: All Access value
Sample: 0 qualifying rounds
Confidence: Insufficient
Cohort: Compared with the women’s division cohort (230 qualifying players)
Definition: Historical performance in major championships.

Raw values behind each percentile

Strokes vs field, rates and both time windows for every dimension.

Included with PropBetEdge All Access.

All Access details

FINISH DISTRIBUTION

Floor and ceiling

26th or worse 21% (3)
Missed cut 79% (11)

14 full-field starts in our record · limited sample.

ROUND PROFILE

Round by round vs field

R1-0.32All observed · n=14

R2-1.75All observed · n=14

R3-3.1All observed · n=4

R4-0.81All observed · n=2

Average strokes per round better (+) or worse (−) than that round’s field average, full-field events only. Consistency: 91st percentile.

HISTORY

Career timeline

Turned pro2017
2024 season1 events · 0 wins · 0 top 10s0/1 cuts
2023 season13 events · 0 wins · 0 top 10s3/13 cuts
First event in our recordLPGA Drive On ChampionshipMar 26, 2023

College and debut from the PropSports athlete record; results observed in our coverage.

MATCHUPS

Compare

vs Choi Hye-jin

vs Minami Katsu

vs Brooke Henderson

vs Pajaree Anannarukarn

vs Amy Yang

vs Chanettee Wannasaen

Build a matchup

SEASONS

Season results

Observed in PropBetEdge coverage. Vs field uses full-field leaderboards only.
Season	Events	Full-field starts	Wins	Top 10	Cuts made	Rounds	Vs field
2024	1	1	0	0	0/1	2	-2.76
2023	13	13	0	0	3/13	32	-1.17

Lowest observed round: 68 (−3) in round 1 of Walmart NW Arkansas Championship pres. by P&G. 13 courses played in coverage.

COURSE HISTORY

Where they have played

Course	Appearances	Best	Cuts	Rounds	Vs field
Columbia Edgewater Country Club	2	53	1/2	6	-1.04
Old American Golf Course	1	—	0/1	2	-1.04
Pinnacle Country Club	1	—	0/1	2	-0.28
Kenwood CC	1	—	0/1	2	-0.95
Galgorm Castle Golf Club	1	—	0/1	3	-0.61
Highland Meadows GC	1	—	0/1	2	-1.51
Blythefield Country Club	1	—	0/1	2	-3.73
Seaview Hotel and Golf Club	1	69	1/1	3	-0.72
Upper Montclair Country Club	1	—	0/1	2	-0.13
Wilshire Country Club	1	—	0/1	2	-2.18
Hoakalei Country Club	1	67	1/1	4	-0.76
Palos Verdes Golf Club	1	—	0/1	2	-0.58

ALL RESULTS

Event history

All observed events
Event	Finish	Rounds	To par	Coverage
2024 Portland Classic	CUT	72-74	—	Full field · every round
The Ascendant LPGA	CUT	73-73	—	Full field · every round
Walmart NW Arkansas Championship pres. by P&G	CUT	68-72	—	Full field · every round
Kroger Queen City Championship pres. by P&G	CUT	70-75	—	Full field · every round
Portland Classic	T53	70-70-72-69	−7	Full field · every round
ISPS Handa World Invitational	CUT	75-73-79	—	Full field · every round
Dana Open	CUT	71-73	—	Full field · every round
Meijer LPGA Classic	CUT	72-78	—	Full field · every round
ShopRite LPGA Classic pres. by Acer	T69	71-72-72	+2	Full field · every round
Cognizant Founders Cup	CUT	75-71	—	Full field · every round
JM Eagle LA Championship	CUT	74-75	—	Full field · every round
LOTTE Championship	T67	71-74-74-74	+5	Full field · every round
DIO Implant LA Open	CUT	73-72	—	Full field · every round
LPGA Drive On Championship	CUT	73-77	—	Full field · every round

Identity, sources and coverage

Identity: PropSports athlete record.

“Observed” totals cover events in PropBetEdge coverage, not complete careers.

DATA · PropSports. Results, fields and course setups adapted in part from Wikipedia articles (CC BY-SA 4.0; the redistributed results dataset is available under the same licence). Player photographs are credited per image. Sources & methodology